ANTH 225
Field School in Subarctic Archaeology and Ethnography
Link to Yukon College Home Page.
shim
shadow

oPrint-Friendly Version

oHome

o2013 Course Outline

oLittle John - Collaboration Leads to Mutual Respect and Success

oFilm: Little John Country

oMap of Central Field Locations and Travel Routes

oSome Photos of the Little John Site Locality

oSome Views From the Little John Site

oNorm Easton's Borderlands Project Publications

oA Little About Norman Easton

oRelation of Little John to Beaver Creek Village

oFor Students - Selected Readings

oFor Students - Personal Field Gear

oFor Students - How Your Grade Is Assessed

o

Discussion

Recent Discussion

Create New Topic

Membership

Login



shim shadow

Readings - Archaeological Methods and Field Analysis

This page contains a series of resources related to the principles of archaeological practice and primary analysis.

PDFs of Course Powerpoint Presentations

1. Archaeological Complexes of the Northwestern Subarctic

2. Principles of Archaeology

3. Stone Tool Manufacture

4. Lithic Material Identification

 

PDFs of selected readings on archaeological method

1. Soils, Sediments, and Geomorphology

2. Stratification

3. 

 

Papers on Lithic Technology and Analysis

Introduction to Lithic Technology - is a PDF containing:

- a list of the typical prehistoric tool technologies found in Yukon

- a selection from Ted Banning's Laboratory Techniques in Archaeology on Analyzing Lithics

- a selection from William Andrefsky's Lithics: Macroscopic Approaches to Analysis

- a selection of notes from Rogers Flintknapping Webpage

William Andrefsky of Washington State University is one of the world leaders in lithic artifact analysis; below are several selections from his classic study Lithics: Macroscopic Approaches to Analysis (2nd ed. 2005 Cambridge University Press).

- Basics of Stone Tool Production

- Lithic Identification and Classification

- Stone Tool Analysis

- Artifact Diversity and Site Function

Burins are tools used for engraving other objects; they are closely associated with bone tool and microblade technologies. Distinguishing them, and their offshoot the Burin Spall, from broken formed tools, flakes or blade-like flakes can be a bit tricky, but is important. Here are two papers that should help you along.

- An examination of the classic Burin and Burin Spall

- Giddings on Burin Spall tools in the North

Microblade technologies are ubiquitous in Late Paleolithic cultures around much of the Northern Latitudes but not all microblades are the same - a variety of production techniques have been recognized, some of which serve to distinguish earlier from later components. Here are a few papers on microblade production and analysis.

- Nakazawa et. al. examines 7 different methods for producing microblades and their characteristic debitage

 

Papers on Archaeological Fauna

- USNPS archaeologist Becky Saleby on the recovery and analysis of archaeological fauna in Alaska, including the Dry Creek, Broken Mammoth, and Swan Point sites.

- Ben Potter's functional analysis of faunal remains from the Gerstle River Quarry site

- Greg Hare's description of Pleistocene fauna recovered near the Little John site at Little Scottie Creek.

 

 

 

 

Respond to this message!

 


Last update: Saturday, May 26, 2012 at 3:30:10 PM
Copyright 2013 ANTH 225 Norman Alexander Easton

shim

This site is using the Anthropology 220 theme.